The path to peace in Gaza is complex, but recent developments signal a bold new approach — and this is where it gets controversial. Yesterday marked a significant step forward: President Donald J. Trump praised the formation of the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), an essential component of his comprehensive plan aimed at ending the long-standing conflict in Gaza. This plan is a detailed 20-point strategy designed to foster lasting stability, rebuild infrastructure, and promote economic growth and prosperity across the region.
The newly formed NCAG will be under the leadership of Dr. Ali Sha’ath, a highly regarded expert known for his practical and technocratic approach. His role will be to oversee efforts to restore vital public services, rebuild civil institutions, and stabilize daily life in Gaza. Furthermore, Dr. Sha’ath’s background in public administration, economic development, and international cooperation equips him well to lay down the groundwork for sustainable governance—an increasingly crucial aspect for the region’s future.
This milestone aligns closely with United Nations Security Council Resolution 2803 (2025), which officially endorsed President Trump’s ambitious plan and expressed support for the establishment of the 'Board of Peace.' This board will play an integral role in ensuring the successful execution of all twenty points in the plan by providing strategic oversight, mobilizing international aid, and maintaining accountability as Gaza transitions from conflict to peace and reconstruction.
To bring this vision to life, a founding Executive Board has been assembled, consisting of influential leaders with expertise spanning diplomacy, development, infrastructure, and economic strategy. The key appointees include figures such as Secretary Marco Rubio, Jared Kushner, Sir Tony Blair, and others, each tasked with managing crucial sectors like governance, regional diplomacy, large-scale reconstruction, investment attraction, and funding mobilization.
Supporting this effort, the President has appointed Aryeh Lightstone and Josh Gruenbaum as senior advisors. Their responsibilities include steering daily operations, translating strategic priorities into actionable initiatives, and ensuring diplomatic goals are met effectively.
In addition, H.E. Nickolay Mladenov, a member of the Executive Board, will serve as the High Representative for Gaza. His role is pivotal: acting as the key liaison between the Board of Peace and the NCAG, he will oversee Gaza’s governance and development efforts on the ground, ensuring coordination among civilian agencies and security forces alike.
Security remains a top priority. Major General Jasper Jeffers has been appointed Commander of the International Stabilization Force (ISF), where he will lead efforts to establish a secure environment, support the disarmament process, and facilitate the safe delivery of humanitarian aid and reconstruction materials.
To further support governance and service delivery, a Gaza Executive Board is also being created. This group will focus on establishing effective management and providing essential services, ultimately fostering peace, stability, and prosperity for Gaza’s residents. Its members include notable leaders from various fields, such as government ministers, military officials, and international experts.
The United States stands firmly behind this transitional framework, working closely with Israel, neighboring Arab countries, and the wider international community. The goal is to realize the objectives within the comprehensive plan swiftly and efficiently.
Looking ahead, additional members for both the Executive Board and Gaza Executive Board will be announced in the coming weeks, reaffirming the ongoing commitment to peace and reconstruction.
But here’s where it gets controversial: each of these moves invites questions and debate about the practicalities, effectiveness, and political nuances involved. Will this framework succeed where others have failed? Is it realistic to expect such a wide array of international players working seamlessly together? And how will local communities in Gaza perceive these initiatives? Share your thoughts—do you believe this approach can truly bring lasting peace, or is it an idealistic move in a fragile region? Let’s discuss in the comments.
