In a move that left many scratching their heads, star closer Edwin Diaz chose the Los Angeles Dodgers over the New York Mets, despite a seemingly competitive offer from the latter. But here's where it gets controversial: was it really just about the money?
Edwin Diaz, the coveted reliever, recently shed some light on his decision to sign with the Dodgers during free agency last December, leaving Mets owner Steve Cohen visibly puzzled. The numbers tell a straightforward story: the Mets offered a three-year, $66 million deal, while the Dodgers countered with a $69 million contract. Yet, Diaz’s choice wasn’t merely about the extra $3 million—or was it? And this is the part most people miss: the Dodgers’ recruitment strategy may have played a bigger role than the paycheck.
In a recent interview, Diaz explained, ‘As a free agent, I had the opportunity to speak with multiple teams. The Dodgers did an exceptional job in their recruitment efforts, and ultimately, I decided this was the best fit for me. I hold nothing but respect for the Mets—the organization, the players, the staff, and the ownership. They treated me incredibly well, and I have no complaints. But now, I’m here with the Dodgers, ready to embark on this new chapter.’
His comments came just a day after Cohen expressed his bewilderment on Mets radio with broadcaster Howie Rose. ‘I found the situation perplexing,’ Cohen admitted. ‘I’m not entirely sure how Edwin arrived at his decision. We believed our offer was highly competitive, and I’d argue it was even more appealing in some ways.’
But here’s the kicker: Did the Mets underestimate the Dodgers’ allure, or did Diaz prioritize something beyond the contract details? The Mets had already anticipated a potential Diaz departure by signing former closers Devin Williams and Luke Weaver as a precautionary measure. Cohen later praised this move, calling it a ‘clever hedge’ in case negotiations with Diaz fell through. ‘When things intensified, I felt confident about our decision to sign Devin Williams,’ Cohen noted. ‘It was a strategic move that paid off.’
For Diaz, the transition to the Dodgers marks a fresh start with a team that has dominated the World Series in recent years. Meanwhile, the Mets are moving forward with a revamped bullpen, ready to prove their resilience. But the question remains: In the high-stakes world of free agency, is it ever just about the money? Or do factors like team culture, recruitment efforts, and championship potential weigh heavier in the balance?
What do you think? Did Diaz make the right choice, or did the Mets miss an opportunity to retain one of the game’s best relievers? Let us know in the comments below. For more insights on Edwin Diaz and the Mets, visit AMNY.com.
